Features and algorithms¶
Quick links to all features:
This Page gives a quick overview of the algorithms used. We have written some papers about the implementation, where all the details can be found.
Using the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method [Blo94], [Blo03] allows us to get rid of the core electrons and work with soft pseudo valence wave functions. The pseudo wave functions don’t need to be normalized - this is important for the efficiency of calculations involving 2. row elements (such as oxygen) and transition metals. A further advantage of the PAW method is that it is an all-electron method (frozen core approximation) and there is a one to one transformation between the pseudo and all-electron quantities.
Description of the wave functions¶
Pseudo wave functions can be described in three ways:
- Finite-difference (FD):
Uniform real-space orthorhombic grids. Two kinds of grids are involved in the calculations: A coarse grid used for the wave functions and a fine grid (\(2^3=8\) times higher grid point density) used for densities and potentials. The pseudo electron density is first calculated on the coarse grid from the wave functions, and then interpolated to the fine grid, where compensation charges are added for achieving normalization. The effective potential is evaluated on the fine grid (solve the Poisson equation and calculate the exchange-correlation potential) and then restricted to the coarse grid where it needs to act on the wave functions (also on the coarse grid).
- Plane-waves (PW):
Expansion in plane-waves. There is one cutoff used for the wave-functions and a higher cutoff for electron densities and potentials.
- Linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO):
Expansion in atom-centered basis functions.
Grid-based techniques for FD-mode¶
Solving the Kohn-Sham equation is done via iterative multi-grid eigensolvers starting from a good guess for the wave functions obtained by diagonalizing a Hamiltonian for a subspace of atomic orbitals. We use the multi-grid preconditioner described by Briggs et al. [Bri96] for the residuals, and standard Pulay mixing is used to update the density.
Compensation charges are expanded to give correct multipole moments up to angular momentum number \(\ell=2\).
In each of the three directions, the boundary conditions can be either periodic or open.
Mask function technique¶
Due to the discreticed nature of space in finite difference methods, the energy of an atom will depend on its position relative to the grid points. The problem comes from the calculation of the integral of a wave function times an atom centered localized function (radial functions times a spherical harmonic). To reduce this dependence, we use the technique of [Taf06], where the radial functions (projector functions) are smoothened as follows:
Divide function by a mask function that goes smoothly to zero at approximately twice the cutoff radius.
Cut off short wavelength components.
Inverse Fourier transform.
Multiply by mask function.
All the functionals from the libxc library can be used. Calculating the XC-energy and potential for the extended pseudo density is simple. For GGA functionals, a nearest neighbor finite difference stencil is used for the gradient operator. In the PAW method, there is a correction to the XC-energy inside the augmentation spheres. The integration is done on a non-linear radial grid - very dense close to the nuclei and less dense away from the nuclei.
Parallelization is done by distributing k-points, spins, and bands over all processors and on top of that domain-decomposition is used.
The code has been designed to work together with the atomic simulation environment (\(ASE <https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/ase>\)). ASE provides:
Nudged elastic band calculations.
Maximally localized Wannier functions.
Scanning tunneling microscopy images.
GPAW is released under the GNU Public License version 3 or any later version. See the file LICENSE which accompanies the downloaded files, or see the license at GNU’s web server at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/. Everybody is invited to participate in using and developing the code.
P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)
P. E. Blöchl, C. J. Först and J. Schimpl, Bull. Mater. Sci, 26, 33 (2003)
E. L. Briggs, D. J. Sullivan and J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev. B 54, 14362 (1996)
A general and efficient pseudopotential Fourier filtering scheme for real space methods using mask functions, Maxim Tafipolsky, Rochus Schmid, J Chem Phys. 2006 May 7;124:174102